Home |  Contact |  Site Map

 
 

Search E-Alerts






Resources

Service Description
Services
Attorney Directory
 

   Creditor Rights & Bankruptcy
 
Creditor Rights & Bankruptcy E-Alerts


May 12, 2008

District Court Remands Ohio Attorney General’s CSPA Enforcement Action against Citibank South Dakota, N.A. For Lack of Federal Jurisdiction  

On October 8, 2007, Ohio Attorney General Marc Dann filed a complaint against Citibank South Dakota, N.A., Potbelly's Sandwich Works, LLC, and Scott Simmons for alleged violations the Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act ("CSPA"). The case involved a flyer that was allegedly circulated on the campus of the Ohio State University promising a free sandwich. The catch, however, was that customers needed to sign up for a credit card through Citibank to redeem their free gift.

The case is of broader interest, however, in light of the fact that the Ohio Attorney General sued Citibank South Dakota, N.A., a national banking association, under the Ohio CSPA. Importantly, Ohio's CSPA includes an express exemption for national banks that excludes transactions between certain financial institutions, including national banks, and their customers.  The Attorney General has argued in support of his complaint, however, that the term "customer" should be narrowly construed and that the exemption should apply only to those transactions between exempted financial institutions and those individuals with existing relationships with the financial institution.

The case was originally filed in the Court of Common Pleas, Franklin County, Ohio (Case Number 07-CVH09-12591), but the defendants removed the action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio (Case Number 07-cv-01149).  On May 1, 2008, Judge Gregory L. Frost entered a decision remanding the case back to state court.  Accordingly, the case is now back before Judge John F. Bender, as Case Number 07-CVH09-12591 in the Court of Common Pleas for Franklin County, Ohio. 

Ohio Attorney General Complaint
Citibank's Motion to Dismiss Complaint
Ohio Attorney General Memorandium in Opposition Motion to Dismiss
Citibank's Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss
District Court Opinion and Order


This E-alert was prepared by Justin W. Ristau. Please contact any member of the Bricker & Eckler Creditor Rights & Bankruptcy group for more information. 

 

Subscribe to E-Alerts

Sign up to receive Creditor & Bankruptcy E-Alerts
Subscribe
 


Most Recent E-Alerts

June 27, 2008
The Supreme Court Disallows Transfer Tax Exemption for Asset Sales Conducted Prior to Plan Confirmation

June 27, 2008
Sixth Circuit Holds that the Earmarking Doctrine Does Not Provide a Refuge from Preference Exposure for Late-Perfecting Secured Creditors

June 2, 2008
Ohio's 10th Appellate District Holds That an Affidavit Attached to a Complaint Did Not Satisfy the Requirements of Civil Rule 10(D)(1) for a Claim on an Account

May 29, 2008
Ohio's Tenth Appellate District Addresses Priority Between Mechanics’ Liens and Mortgages; Prejudgment Interest on Mechanics’ Liens

May 19, 2008
Ohio's Eighth Appellate District Affirms Class Certification Against Fannie Mae Based On Untimely Recordation Of Mortgage Releases

Index to all E-Alerts



 

 

Copyright 2005-2008, Bricker & Eckler LLP, all rights reserved.  Please read our Privacy Notice.
The words Bricker & Eckler and its logo are registered trademarks of Bricker & Eckler LLP