What's New in the
World of Job Safety?
Reprinted from August 2006 ohioconstructionlaw.com
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) can seriously affect any Contractor or construction project. Compliance with OSHA regulations can be time-consuming and tedious, but it is essential to maintain a viable position in the construction industry. This month, as always, we report on recent developments in the world of OSHA.
School Construction + Multi-Prime =
Multi-Employer Citation Policy
Most school construction projects in Ohio are completed using multiple
contractors and numerous subcontractors. This is the result of the State’s
statutory requirements that multiple prime contractors be used on school
construction projects. Contractors and subcontractors should be thoroughly
familiar with their responsibility to protect employees working for other
contractors on the site and employees of their own subcontractors.
For worksites just like these school construction sites, the Occupational
Safety and Health Administration developed a multi-employer citation policy and
subsequently provided clarifications to that policy in 1999. The policy
basically states that more than one employer may be cited for a hazardous
condition that violates an OSHA standard.
OSHA uses a two-step process to determine whether more than one employer should
be cited. The first step is to determine the roles of the individual employers.
The roles include the employer who created the hazardous condition (creating
employer), the employer who exposes its own employees to a hazardous condition
(exposing employer), the employer who is responsible for correcting a hazard
and/or maintaining particular safety equipment (correcting employer), and the
employer who has the general supervisory authority over the website
(controlling employer).
In many cases an employer can face a citation even if its own employees are not
subjected to a hazardous condition. Where employees are subjected to a
hazardous condition but an employer other than their own caused that hazard,
the employer can still face citations for the hazardous condition. The
controlling employer can be exposed to citations where its contract explicitly
establishes that the employer has authority to control or, where the contract
fails to spell out authority over worksite safety, where actual practice shows
the employer exercises control.
Once an employer’s role is determined, the next step is to determine if the
employer’s actions were sufficient to meet the obligations imposed by OSHA
requirements. “The extent of the actions required of employers varies based on
which category (of employer) applies.”
Creating employers. The analysis for a creating employer is simple:
“Employers must not create violative conditions.” Create a condition that
violates an OSHA standard, and you will earn a citation.
Exposing employers. An exposing employer will be cited if it “(1) knew of
the hazardous condition or failed to exercise reasonable diligence to discover
the condition, and (2) failed to take steps consistent with its authority to
protect its employees.” Where an exposing employer has authority to fix a
hazardous condition, it must do so. Where the exposing employer lacks such
authority, it must “(1) ask the creating and/or controlling employer to correct
the hazard; (2) inform its employees of the hazard; and (3) take reasonable
alternative protective measures.” In extreme circumstances the exposing
employer must remove its employees from the job.
Correcting employers. A correcting employer is required to “exercise
reasonable care in preventing and discovering violations and meet its
obligations of correcting the hazard.”
Controlling employers. The controlling employer “must exercise reasonable
care to prevent and detect violations on the site.” The controlling employer is
not required to take all of the protective measures that are required of an
employer that is protecting its own employees. The controlling employer would
not be required to inspect as frequently in some cases, and the controlling
employer might not have the same knowledge of the applicable standards or trade
expertise as the exposing employer would have.
The Citation Policy goes on to describe factors related to the “reasonable
care” standard. The factors relate to how “frequently and closely a controlling
employer must inspect” to meet the reasonable care standard. It also
illustratee how each employer would be evaluated. Read the full text of the
Multi-Employer Worksite Policy.
National Census Shows Construction
Takes the Lead in Fatal Injuries
Every year since 1992, the Bureau of Labor Statistics has conducted a Census of
Fatal Occupational Injuries. On August 10th the Census for the 2005 calendar
year was released. It also included preliminary data for that year.
Construction-related fatalities outnumbered those in any other industry, with a
total of 1,186 fatal work injuries in 2005. This number was higher, by more
than 300 fatalities, than that for the next industry sector. The number of
construction industry fatalities did fall by 4% when compared to the 2004
Census data, however.
Within the construction industry, there were increases in the number of
fatalities associated with residential building construction, utility system
construction, and highway, street, and bridge construction. There was a decline
in the number of fatalities associated with specialty contractors. The total
number of fatalities in Ohio, regardless of industry sector, also declined from
202 in 2004 to 168 in 2005.
OSHA’s related news release and a link to the 2005 Census data.