|
October 2006
VIEW OR PRINT ENTIRE ISSUE IN PDF FORMAT
EPA Unveils Environmental Compliance
Tool for Colleges and Universities
The Environmental Protection Agency unveiled a
new compliance assistance center targeted at colleges
and universities. Under an agreement with
the National Association of College and University
Business Officers, the EPA will provide an initial
$65,000 towards the project and up to $350,000
over the next five years. The compliance center
is designed to help college and university environmental
managers better understand the range
of environmental issues they face and to improve
their compliance. For more information, visit the
EPA website.
Ohio Supreme Court Denies Property
Tax Exemption for Church Print Shop
In a 4-3 decision, the Ohio Supreme Court denied
a property tax exemption for a church-owned
print shop. See First Baptist Church of Milford
v. Comm’r (2006), 110 Ohio St.3d 496.
The case involved a nonprofit corporation that
prints Bibles for free distribution as well as other
materials for sale. First Baptist Church of Milford
controls the print shop, which occupies a building
owned by the church. During the years in question,
between 3% and 12% of the print shop’s revenue
was derived from printing materials for sale. The
church sought tax exemption for the building under
R.C. 5709.12(B), as property used “exclusively for
charitable purposes.”
The Ohio Tax Commissioner denied the claimed
tax exemption, arguing that the building was not
used exclusively for charitable purposes. The
church appealed this determination to the Board
of Tax Appeals, which affirmed the decision of
the Tax Commissioner. In reviewing the case, the Supreme Court held that the charitable
exemption from property taxes requires that
“charitable use and ownership” coincide. As
a result, the court refused to grant a charitable
property tax exemption to the church when
the charitable use of the property was actually
conducted by another corporation.
Illinois Revokes Property Tax
Exemption of Hospital
The Illinois Department of Revenue affirmed
a decision of the Champaign County Board of
Review and denied property tax exemption for
a 120-bed acute care hospital owned by Provena
Covenant Medical Center.
The hospital applied for a charitable property
tax exemption for its hospital in 2002. Under
Illinois law, the charitable property tax exemption
requires that the property be “actually and
exclusively” used by charitable institutions
for charitable purposes and not with a view to
profit. The Department interprets this standard
to require that the hospital’s “primary” purpose
be to provide charity care; the facts, however,
established that the hospital expended only
0.7% of its revenue ($832,000) on charitable
activities, while its property tax exemption was
valued at more than $1.1 million.
The Department also dismissed the hospital’s
arguments that its provision of emergency
services should be considered charity, noting
that the hospital outsourced its emergency
room functions to a for-profit corporation. The
Department also flatly rejected the hospital’s arguments
that Medicare and Medicaid shortfalls
be considered charity. Finally, the Department
criticized the hospital’s charity care policies,
both in form and operation. Ultimately, the Department
noted that over 97% of the hospital’s
revenues came from patient charges. Based on
this finding, the Department characterized the use of this property as for the exchange of services
for payment, which was not a charitable activity. The
hospital is pursuing an appeal of this decision.
Although the decision turns on questions of Illinois
law, the underlying principles are applicable to nonprofit
hospitals that have received or are seeking
charitable property tax exemptions throughout the
United States and these hospitals should follow the
developments in this case very closely.
IRS Struggling to Implement PPA Provisions;
Issues Transitional Guidance
The IRS acknowledged that it is struggling to implement
all of the mandates imposed on it by the recently
enacted Pension Protection Act. As noted previously
in the Nonprofit Advocate, the PPA included charitable
giving incentives (such as allowing donations
of IRAs), charitable reform (affecting donor-advised
funds and supporting organizations), as well as reporting
changes (requiring small organizations to file
annual reports with the IRS). Many of these changes
will also necessitate corresponding changes in information
returns filed by these organizations.
The IRS has, however, issued transition guidance on
the new qualified appraiser standards in the PPA. See
Notice 2006-96, 2006-46 IRB ___.
The PPA amended section 170 of the Internal Revenue
Code to require that taxpayers obtain a “qualified
appraisal” by a “qualified appraiser” for non-cash
charitable contributions of more than $5,000 made
after August 17, 2006. Under the new law, a qualified
appraiser is a person who has earned an appraisal
designation from a recognized professional organization
or has otherwise met minimum education and
experience requirements, demonstrates verifiable experience
in appraising the type of property that is being
appraised and satisfies various other requirements.
The IRS is defining a “qualified appraisal” as one
performed by a qualified appraiser pursuant to the generally
accepted appraisal standards. The IRS further
clarifies that an appraisal designation must be met on
the basis of “demonstrated competency” in appraising
the type of property being appraised and must be
accompanied by a declaration to this effect. The IRS
also issued transition rules on when an appraiser is
deemed to satisfy the minimum education and experience
requirements for various types of property.
The IRS is
requesting comments on these proposed regulations
by January 17, 2007.
“Community Benefit” Update
The Senate Finance Committee appears to be planning
to introduce legislation on the “community benefit
standard” in the coming year
The Catholic Healthcare Association released a
template that nonprofit hospitals may attach to the
their Forms 990 to report community benefit. The
template is available on the CHA website.
The American Hospital Association, meanwhile,
criticized the IRS community benefit question as
not being specific enough. The AHA noted that
the questionnaire failed to ask hospitals to disclose
whether responses on uncompensated care were based
on cost or charge or whether fees charged were below
the costs of service. The AHA also noted that the “yes”
or “no” format used in several sections of the questionnaire
could permit hospitals to provide provision
answers, further distorting their responses.
Also in October, the Montana Attorney General has
requested 12 Montana hospitals submit information
about their charity care and community benefit practices
to ‘ensure that hospitals are properly carrying out
their charitable missions.” The state questionnaire is
based on Form 13790, the IRS’s community benefit
questionnaire.
IRS Provides Transition Relief for
Payors
of Tax-Exempt Interest
The IRS has provided transition relief to certain payors
of tax-exempt interest. See Notice 2006-93, 2006-44
IRB ___. The Tax Increase Prevent and Reconciliation
Act amended section 6409 of the Internal Revenue
Code by requiring payors of state and municipal bond
tax-exempt interest to report payments of such interest
made after December 31, 2005 to the IRS. The notice
permits payors to report payments of tax-exempt interest
made in 2006 on Form 1099-INT and waives the
obligation to file electronic information returns. The
IRS also indicated that it would waive penalties for
the failure to report payments of tax-exempt interest
under section 6409 for 2006. The IRS also granted
transition relief under the backup withholding rules
for payments made before March 31, 2007.
IRS Revises Process for Issuers to Appeal
Proposed Adverse Determinations on
Tax-Exempt Bonds
The IRS revised the process for issuers to appeal a
proposed adverse determination that bonds do not
qualify for the exclusion of interest from gross income
provided by section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code.
See Revenue Procedure 2006-40, 2006-42 IRB 694.
The new revenue procedure modifies and supersedes
the old appeals program (in Rev. Proc. 99-35).
|