|
Don't Let Your "TIF" Cause a "Tiff"
July/August 2003
By: Price D. Finley
VIEW OR PRINT ARTICLE IN PDF FORMAT
No, the title of this article is not meant to be a
spelling test. “TIF” is an acronym for “tax increment
financing,” the topic of this article. Merriam-Webster
defines a “tiff” as a “petty quarrel.” Ironically, many
economic development practitioners mistakenly refer
to tax increment financing as a “TIFF” (perhaps their
automatic spell checkers are to blame). This is ironic
because, without careful preparation, a “TIF” can
evolve into something more than just a petty quarrel,
either between the municipality implementing the
TIF exemption and the property owner/developer,
or between the municipality and the affected school
district.
What is a TIF?
Tax increment financing (TIF) is an infrastructure financing
tool authorized by several different sections
of the Ohio Revised Code. It is generally viewed as an
economic development tool because it provides a
mechanism for the funding of infrastructure
improvements that “directly benefit” the commercial
development that results in the economic development
(i.e., creation of jobs, long-term increase in property
values, etc.). Although a TIF can be implemented by a
municipal corporation (within the boundaries of the
municipality) or by a county or township (within the
unincorporated portion of the county), this article
focuses on municipal TIFs.
A TIF is similar to Enterprise Zone (EZ) and
Community Reinvestment Area (CRA) programs
because it provides an exemption from property taxes
of the increased property value from a commercial
development project. What makes a TIF different is
that the property owner is required to make “service
payments in lieu of taxes” (commonly referred to as
PILOTs) with respect to the exempted real property
taxes. Those PILOTs are used to pay for costs of the
infrastructure improvements (or to pay debt service
charges on bonds or notes issued to finance the
infrastructure improvements). Thus, the property
owner does not receive a direct financial benefit (as is
the case with EZ and CRA programs) but instead gets a
more indirect benefit because the PILOTs are used to
fund infrastructure improvements, the costs of which
the property owner might otherwise have to pay. In
comparison to an EZ exemption, which can apply to
both real and personal property taxes, a TIF exemption
applies only to real property taxes.
For example, if a property owner or other party
undertaking a commercial development (a Developer)
needed to invest $10 million on a new building but the
site of the development did not have adequate roads
and needed water and sewer service, tax increment
financing could provide the funding mechanism for
such infrastructure improvements. The reason a TIF
is advantageous for the Developer is that, if the real
property effective tax rate for commercial property
were 65 mills (including millage that, without a TIF
exemption, would go to the county, township,
municipality, school district, and any special taxing
districts), using a TIF, the increased property taxes that
would otherwise be distributed to those subdivisions is
instead used to pay costs of those infrastructure
improvements. In this example, because real property
is taxed at its “assessed” value (35 % of its true value),
the new building would produce $227,500 of PILOTs
annually ($3,500,000 x .065 = $227,500 – 1 mill
produces $1 for each $1,000 of value). This additional
revenue could be used to pay for costs of the road,
water and sewer improvements that enable that site
to service the project.
TIFs are considered economic development tools (just
like EZs and CRAs) because they help one community
“level the playing field” with respect to other
communities against which they may be competing to
attract commercial development and, in turn, employers.
In the example above, if the Developer were looking at
potential sites in two different communities, one that had
all of the necessary infrastructure in place and the other
that needed to build it, a TIF enables the second
community to provide that infrastructure and does not
require the Developer to provide those infrastructure
improvements, which would have added millions of
dollars of cost to the second site. Now the two sites can
compete on the basis of other factors like workforce,
community support, quality of life, etc.
What are the terms of a TIF?
A TIF is implemented by an ordinance of council.
The ordinance determines that the development or
redevelopment of a site serves a public purpose and
declares the increased real property values resulting
from such development to be exempt from real
property taxation. Under Ohio law, the maximum term
of a TIF exemption is 30 years, and the maximum
percentage exemption is 100 %; however, as discussed
in more detail below, without the consent of the affected
city, local, or exempted village school district, the
exemption cannot exceed 10 years or be greater than 75
%.
The TIF exemption commences with the tax year in
which an improvement first appears on the tax list and
duplicate of real and public utility property that begins
after the effective date of the TIF ordinance. Under the
terms of the TIF, the property owner is required to pay
the PILOTs in an amount equal to the real property
taxes that would have been payable if the property had
not received the TIF exemption. The PILOTs paid by
the property owner are deposited into a special tax
increment equivalent fund and used to pay costs of
infrastructure improvements that directly benefit the
property owner.
It is important to note that a TIF exemption does not
affect existing real property taxes. If a parcel that is
the subject of a TIF has historically been valued at
$500,000, the property taxes from that land value are
not exempted by the TIF. They continue to be collected
and distributed to the county, township, municipality,
school district, and any special taxing districts just as
they were prior to the TIF exemption. The TIF
exemption only relates to the increased value in the
land (which may result from rezoning of the parcel or
other factors resulting from the parcel’s development)
and the increased value from the new buildings. Thus,
in our example the Developer would pay $11,375 in
real property taxes on the land value (35 % of $500,000
x 65 mills), which would be distributed to the county,
township, municipality, school district, and any special
taxing districts, and $227,500 in PILOTs relating to the
increased building value. If the value of the land
increased by $100,000 after the implementation of the
TIF, the amount of the PILOT would be increased by
$2,275 (35 % of $100,000 x 65 mills).
What are some of the key issues affecting
how a TIF is implemented?
Project Subject to TIF Exemption
The Ohio Revised Code provides a broad definition of
the types of commercial improvements that may be
included in the TIF exemption (and, therefore, used
to generate PILOTs) by defining the “project” (the
infrastructure improvements eligible for a TIF
exemption) to include “construction, expansion, and
alteration of buildings or structures, demolition,
remediation, and site development, and any building
or structure that results from those activities."1
Residential TIF
A TIF of residential property is permitted only in
limited circumstances. First, a residential TIF is
permitted in situations where the project is located in a
“blighted area of an impacted city,” as defined in RC
Chpt. 1728. Second, a municipality is permitted to
utilize a residential TIF when it creates an “incentive
district.” An incentive district is an area not more than
300 acres in size enclosed by a continuous boundary
and having one or more of the following “distress
characteristics,” as set forth in RC 5709.40:
At least 51 % of the residents of the district have
incomes of less than 80 % of the median income
of residents of the political subdivision in which
the district is located2.
The average rate of unemployment in the district
during the most recent 12-month period for
which data are available is equal to at least 150 %
of the average rate of unemployment for this
state for the same period.
At least 20 % of the people residing in the district
live at or below the poverty level3.
The district is a “blighted area.”
The district is in a situational distress area as
designated by the director of development under
RC 122.23 (F)4.
As certified by the engineer for the municipality,
the public infrastructure serving the district is
inadequate to meet the development needs of the
district as evidenced by a written economic
development plan or urban renewal plan for the
district that has been adopted by the council of
the municipality.
The district is comprised entirely of unimproved
land that is located in a distressed area as
defined in section RC 122.235.
Of the seven distress characteristics described above,
the sixth characteristic, inadequacy of existing
infrastructure, would seem to be satisfied in almost any
tax increment financing project, since the TIF is to be
used to provide for infrastructure costs. The most
challenging part of satisfying the requirements for
that characteristic may be the need for a “written
economic development plan or urban renewal plan
for the district.”
Within an incentive district, not only can the increased
value of residential development be included in the TIF,
but also the PILOTs can be used to provide for “housing
renovations” (including financing or supporting loans,
deferred loans, and grants for housing renovations);
provided the district also includes commercial or
industrial property6. The legislation creating the
incentive district must designate parcels within the
district that are eligible for housing renovation and must
state separately the amounts or percentages of the
expected aggregate PILOTs that are designated for each
infrastructure improvement and for the general purpose
of housing renovation. A municipality can create
multiple incentive districts within its boundaries7.
Public Infrastructure Improvements
The Revised Code also broadly defines “public
infrastructure improvement"8 (the improvements that
can be paid from the PILOTs), to include:
public roads and highways;
water and sewer lines;
environmental remediation;
land acquisition, including acquisition in aid of
industry, commerce, distribution, or research;
demolition, including demolition on private
property when determined to be necessary for
economic development purposes;
stormwater and flood remediation projects,
including such projects on private property
when determined to be necessary for public
health, safety, and welfare;
the provision of gas, electric, and
communications service facilities; and
the enhancement of public waterways through
improvements that allow for greater public access.
Thus, the development activities that can be used to
generate the PILOTs are very inclusive, as is the list
of eligible infrastructure costs.
What is the role of the school district with
respect to the implementation of a TIF?
School District Notice and Consent
Prior to the date that council adopts the TIF ordinance,
the municipality must give notice to the affected city,
local, or exempted village school district, as well as the
joint vocational school district, of its intent to grant the
TIF exemption for the project. The notice must be
delivered to such school districts not less than 14 days
prior to the date that council intends to adopt the TIF
ordinance. If the municipality intends to exceed the
10 year/75 % threshold, the municipality must give
notice to the affected city, local, or exempted village
school district (but not the joint vocational school
district) at least 45 business days prior to adopting the
TIF ordinance, and such school district’s board of
education must, by resolution of its board, consent to
the TIF exemption9. This requirement for school
district consent can be avoided if the municipality
uses TIF moneys to “make whole” the city, local, or
exempted village school district (this “non-school
TIF” is difficult to accomplish in most cases because
such a large portion of the real estate taxes go to the
school district) before it pays for infrastructure costs10.
The school district, in approving the TIF exemption,
may waive the 14-day and 45-business day notice
requirements11.
Income Tax Sharing
Regardless of whether the affected city, local, or
exempted village is required to approve the TIF
exemption, if the project will generate annual payroll
for “new employees”12 of $1,000,000 or more, the
municipality is required to attempt to negotiate an
income tax sharing arrangement with the affected
school district (but not the joint vocational school
district)13. If an agreement is not negotiated within 6
months after council formally approves the TIF
exemption, the municipality is required to split
income tax revenue generated from new employees
with the school district on a 50/50 basis, subject to
the “infrastructure set-off.”
Under the infrastructure
set-off, for any year in which the income tax sharing
requirement is in effect, the municipality is permitted
to deduct from its compensation payment to the school district the infrastructure costs
(which includes debt service charges on infrastructure
bonds) incurred in that calendar year; provided that
such infrastructure costs cannot exceed 35 % (or a
higher amount if approved by the school district) of
the taxes levied and collected on the income of new
employees at the site14. Income tax sharing is not
required if the municipality employs a non-school
TIF, as described above15.
School Compensation Agreements
Increasingly, communities are finding creative ways to
utilize the unique aspects of Ohio school funding when
it comes to seeking school board approval for the
creation of a TIF. Ohio school districts receive their
funding from two primary sources - local property
taxes and state funding. For most school districts, as
local property values increase state funding is reduced.
The biggest factor in creating this situation is known as
the “23-mill charge-off,” which reduces a school
district’s state aid amount by 23 mills times the
adjusted assessed valuation for that district16. This is
based on an assumption that every school district has
at least 23 mills of local revenue from property tax
levies. Some municipalities have taken advantage of
this anomaly by establishing a TIF with a 100 %
exemption and then making a compensation payment
to the affected school district for all or a portion of the
property taxes that the school district would have
received if the property had not received the TIF
exemption. In certain circumstances this will put the
school district in a more favorable financial situation,
on a net basis, than it would have been in had the
development been undertaken without any exemption.
Using this model, the municipality and the school
district can find themselves in one of those rare
win-win situations.
What are some of the important financing
issues relating to the use of TIFs?
As previously noted, a TIF is typically used to make
debt service payments on bonds issued to finance the
infrastructure improvements (TIF Bonds). Two issues
are worth noting in this context: (1) credit/security
issues relating to the TIF Bonds; and (2) tax exemption
of interest on the TIF Bonds. If the municipality is willing
to issue TIF Bonds for the project, it very likely will
require that the Developer provide the municipality with
assurances that the PILOTs will cover the principal and
interest requirements of the TIF Bonds.
Marketability of TIF Bonds
In our example above, the commercial development,
once built, will generate $229,775 annually in PILOTs
($2,275 from the increase in the value of the land and
$227,500 from the new building value). At 6 % interest
financed over 25 years with level debt service payments
(same amount of total principal and interest paid each
year, like a home mortgage), $229,775 of PILOTs would
cover principal and interest on approximately $2.9
million of TIF Bonds. However, until the development
is completed, there is no assurance that the TIF revenue
stream will be created.
Revenue Bonds vs. General Obligation Bonds
While the municipality might want to finance the
infrastructure improvements pledging only the revenue
from the TIF (and not a pledge of its general obligation
taxing power), in most cases TIF Bonds would not be
marketable without some additional security that
investors can rely on as the source of payment of
principal and interest on the TIF Bonds. The TIF Bonds
may not be marketable because, at the time the TIF is
implemented and the TIF Bonds are issued, the
development that will create the PILOTs has not been
completed (and sometimes not even started).
Although, in some cases, the municipality may be
willing to use its general obligation taxing power to
provide the security for the TIF Bonds, this may not be
practical. The municipality may not have sufficient
capacity to issue general obligation bonds for the
project17. Although a TIF Bond would generally be
exempt from the direct debt (or statutory) limit because
it would be considered self-supporting, such debt would
not be exempt for the indirect debt (or 10-mill) limit.
Thus a municipality that might be otherwise willing to
issue general obligation debt for the infrastructure
improvements might not be able to do so because of the
10-mill limitation.
Developer Security
Even if the municipality were willing to issue general
obligation bonds to finance the infrastructure
improvements, most municipalities would require that
the Developer provide some security to protect against
the development risk associated with the project. That
might include a minimum service payment agreement
and a letter of credit provided by a bank. Under a
minimum service payment agreement, the Developer
agrees that minimum payments, equal to principal of
and interest on the TIF Bonds, will be paid by the
Developer to the municipality, regardless of the PILOT
that would otherwise be payable based on the assessed
value of the project. That way, the municipality would
not be required to assume the development risk
associated with the project18.
Many times the
municipality implementing the TIF also requires the
Developer to provide a letter of credit19, for the benefit
of the municipality in order to guarantee that the
Developer will be able to complete the project and
that the PILOTs will be sufficient to pay debt service on
the TIF Bonds. In most cases, the Developer is required
to maintain the letter of credit through construction
and into project stabilization, with an established
PILOT-to-debt service ratio greater than the annual
debt service requirements of the TIF Bonds20.
Developer Construction Agreement
The TIF project could also be structured as an
arrangement between the municipality and the
Developer whereby the Developer undertakes to make
the infrastructure improvements and is reimbursed
with TIF revenues. Under this arrangement, the
Developer has a contract with the municipality to
construct the infrastructure improvements and,
upon completion, dedicate them to the municipality.
The municipality agrees in turn to pay over the
PILOTs, when collected, to the Developer. Thus, the
municipality does not issue TIF Bonds or assume
development risk, and the Developer only gets repaid
for infrastructure costs if the project is successful21.
Special Assessments
Additional financing structural options include the use
of a special assessment as a means of providing
security for the debt until the TIF produces PILOTs
sufficient to cover debt service charges on the TIF
Bonds. A special assessment is a “special and local
charge levied upon property especially benefited by a
public improvement for the purpose of paying all or a
portion of the cost of such improvement.” 22
Special
assessments have been used in Ohio since at least 1854
and have been used to provide a broad range of
infrastructure improvements for property owners. A
special assessment is an additional charge, over and
above the amount of the real property tax levy, that is
used to pay for the costs of infrastructure
improvements that specially benefit the property.
Thus, a special assessment will not be affected by the
valuation of the real property subject to the assessment
or improvements to that property.
Special assessments
are specifically authorized by statute23. Under a
combined TIF-special assessment financing structure,
which has been utilized by several Ohio communities
under various forms, the TIF is intended to be
sufficient to pay debt service on the TIF Bonds.
However, if the TIF does not, for one reason or another,
generate sufficient PILOTs, the special assessment will
be collected to pay debt service on the TIF Bonds. This
structure may be advantageous for the Developer
because the Developer is not required to supply a letter
of credit or other security for the PILOTs and does not
have to depend on the TIF revenues to assure
repayment of infrastructure costs (i.e., the Developer
could sell the property without worrying about being
able to recover the infrastructure costs from the TIF).
This approach may also be advantageous if the
municipality would have otherwise been required to
issue general obligation bonds to finance the project.
Tax-Exempt Financing
Depending on the structure of the financing, in most
cases the TIF Bonds would be tax-exempt (i.e., interest
on the debt would be excluded from gross income for
federal tax purposes) and, therefore, would bear
interest at a lower rate than conventional debt, which
would be at a taxable interest rate. Issues that impact
tax-exempt versus taxable financing include: (a)
ownership and control of the infrastructure (public
ownership necessary for tax-exempt debt); (b) lack
of preferential rights to use the infrastructure
improvements (i.e., project is generally open to the
public); and (c) whether it is reasonable to expect
on the date that the Developer agrees to provide a
guarantee for the payment of debt service on the
TIF Bonds (i.e., letter of credit or minimum service
payment agreement) that payments will actually be
made with respect to such guarantee24. Tax-exempt
financing would be available for any of the financing
structures previously discussed, but the municipality
would need to carefully structure the transaction to
avoid characteristics of taxable debt.
What are keys for a municipality considering
a TIF project?
If nothing else, the discussion in this article
demonstrates that a TIF is complicated and difficult to
initiate and administer. When considering the use of
tax increment financing, a municipality should
consider the following issues:
-
How important is the project to the community?
What are the infrastructure needs of the project,
and who should provide that infrastructure?
What is the school district’s attitude about TIFs in
general and about the project?
What is the reputation and credit of the
developer and its affiliates?
How reliable are the projections that are being
used to build the TIF revenue model?
How is the risk associated with the development
of the project to be minimized?
Is the municipality able to access the credit
markets on its own?
Conclusion
With careful analysis and planning, tax increment
financing can be an effective financing tool for
municipal infrastructure improvements. Without that
analysis and planning, a municipality may find itself in
the middle of a TIFF among the Developer and the
school district.
Footnotes
Reprinted from Finley’s Ohio Municipal Service, with the permission of the
publisher and copyright owner, West Group.
|