Home |  Contact |  Site Map

 
 

Resources

Service Description
Attorney Directory
 


Related Services

Litigation
 

   Appellate Advocacy
 
Recent Developments in the Courts

 

Ohio Supreme To Rule on Malpractice Expert Affidavit

UPDATE: The Ohio Supreme Court issued its decision in this case on October 24, 2007 and held that the denial of a motion to dismiss when there is a failure to file an affidavit of merit is not a final appealable order.

Full text of the Ohio Supreme Court decision


Manley v. Marsico, in the Ohio Supreme Court, involves the affidavit of merit requirement found in Ohio Civil Rule 10(D)(2), which became effective in July 2005. The statute requires a plaintiff in a medical negligence case to file with the complaint an affidavit from a qualified medical expert stating that the affiant: (1) has reviewed the medical records concerning the allegations; (2) is familiar with the applicable standard of care; and (3) holds the opinion that the standard of care was breached by one or more of the defendants and that the breach caused injury to the plaintiff.

In the Manley case, the plaintiff failed to file the affidavit of merit. Defendant Marsico filed a motion to dismiss for failure to comply with the affidavit of merit rule. The trial court denied the motion and defendant Marsico appealed. The Twelfth District Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal for lack of a final appealable order.

The Ohio Supreme Court accepted the discretionary appeal. Briefs filed in support of appellant were filed on December 12, 2006. The appellee's brief was filed on January 31, 2007 and oral argument was held on May 24, 2007.

An archived video of the oral argument is available on the Ohio Supreme Court archived arguments page under May 24, 2007.

Bricker & Eckler represents amici curiae Ohio Hospital Association, Ohio State Medical Association and Ohio Osteopathic Association in support of the defendant-appellant. The amici curiae argue that the affidavit of merit rule is effectively meaningless if an immediate appeal from a decision denying dismissal for failure to comply is not permitted.

Amici curiae brief on behalf of Ohio Hospital Association, Ohio State Medical Association and Ohio Osteopathic Association


For more information regarding this case, contact Anne Marie Sferra chair of the Bricker & Eckler appellate group.

 

 

Highlights


The Ohio Supreme Court on December 27, 2007 rules in the case of Arbino v. Johnson & Johnson and upholds limitations on damages in general tort actions and on February 21, 2008 in Groch v. General Motors Corp. finding the statute of repose for product liability actions and the subrogation statutes facially constitutional
Ohio Supreme Court Upholds Tort Reform

Recent cases in the Ohio courts
Recent Court News

Cases and briefs from Bricker & Eckler's appellate practice
Representative Cases

Read about Thompson v. Hayes, a case addressing the legality of an important aspect of Ohio's Medicaid program and the role of county MR/DD boards
Thompson v. Hayes
 


Special Features

Resources and information on Ohio tort reform, including information on challenges to the laws before the Ohio courts
Ohio Tort Reform and Asbestos, Silica and Mixed Dust Reform  

 

Copyright 2005-2008, Bricker & Eckler LLP, all rights reserved.  Please read our Privacy Notice.
The words Bricker & Eckler and its logo are registered trademarks of Bricker & Eckler LLP