Spring 2008
VIEW OR PRINT
ENTIRE ISSUE IN PDF FORMAT
OR
GO DIRECTLY TO NEWSLETTER INDEX TO SELECT ARTICLES OF INTEREST
Editor's Note . . .
Bad facts often result in bad law, whether made
by a court or a legislature. The language of the
holding resulting from the bad facts in Schoon v.
Troy Corp. is bad law. During the director’s term
of office, the corporation’s bylaws provided that
“the Corporation shall pay the expenses incurred
by any present or former director . . . reasonably
incurred . . . in defending any threatened
or pending Proceeding .
. . in advance of the final
disposition.” After the
director “resigned due
to health problems,” the
corporation amended its
bylaws to “delete former
directors from entitlement to advancement.”
The spouse of the former director, who had died
in the interim, argued that a director’s right to
advancement of expenses vests “when he took
office” and that the corporation could not subsequently
terminate that right without his consent.
The court rejected that argument, holding that
the right only vests upon “the date of the filing
of the pleading against him.”
The court’s holding ignores a plethora of precedent
that nothing should be done that will result
in discouraging outside persons, especially those
who are independent, from being directors.
Oversight by outside persons is not only the best
defense against mismanagement and fraud, but
also the best offense for good management and
governance. Persons deciding to become or
continue as directors should be able to rely
upon bylaw provisions in effect at the time of
their decision to serve as directors.
Thanks to the holding of the court in Schoon,
persons deciding to become or continue as
directors of a Delaware
corporation cannot rely
upon any bylaw protection
unless it is still in
place at the time of a legal
action against them.
As discussed in the article
by Kevin Kinross,
“Do you want protection?
– Better get it in
writing,” the solution for
directors of the Delaware corporation, and a
consideration for directors of any corporation,
before accepting or continuing any directorship,
is to set forth their rights to indemnification in
an indemnification agreement, separate of the
bylaws, that is between the corporation and
each director.
Although bad facts have apparently resulted
in bad law in Delaware, corporations as well
as directors should review their organization’s
governing documents and consider separate
indemnification agreements to ensure the
willingness of independent persons to continue
as directors.
Index to Acredula
Spring 2008
The Crunch On Director Responsibility: A Storm is
Brewing
Enterprise risk-management will turn the corporate focus to the duty of care.
Do You Want Protection? Better Get it in Writing
Discussion of a Delaware case suggesting the need for directors to set forth their rights to indemnification in
an indemnification agreement, separate of the bylaws.
Thinking of Becoming a Director?
A checklist to assist anyone considering becoming a
director to help facilitate their consideration of whether to accept the role.
Attributes of Quality Board Members:
Asks Simple Penetrating Questions
Part Four of the continuing series on attributes of quality board members.
The “What” and “Why” of Advisory Boards
Discussion of why an advisory board is of value and the role of the advisory board.
|