Overview
Intellectual property is one of your most valuable business assets. From ideation through enforcement, our intellectual property (IP) attorneys help clients preserve, protect, and commercialize their creative assets and innovations. Clients choose to work with our IP team because of our commitment to safeguarding brands, securing ownership rights, and positioning innovation for long-term success.
We have deep experience across trademarks, copyrights, patents, and trade secrets, and advise clients ranging from small start-ups and school districts to colleges, growth-stage companies, entertainers, authors, and Fortune 500 corporations. Our practical, business‑focused approach ensures that every IP strategy aligns with your goals, industry, and competitive environment.
Our attorneys don’t just understand IP—we understand what’s at stake when innovation goes unprotected. With insight spanning nearly every major industry, we partner with you to secure protections, manage portfolios, license creations, and resolve disputes efficiently and strategically.
Who We Represent:
-
Authors, artists, and innovators
-
Colleges and universities
-
Fortune 500 companies
-
Health care organizations
-
Insurance companies
-
Manufacturing companies
-
Nonprofit organizations
-
Private and publicly held businesses
-
Technology companies
-
Entertainers, creators, and media professionals
At Bricker Graydon Wyatt, we are dedicated to delivering proactive, business‑focused, and industry‑informed intellectual property counsel that helps innovators, creators, and organizations protect their most valuable assets.
Trademarks & Brand Protection
-
Availability searches
-
Risk analysis and clearance opinions
-
S. and international registration applications
-
Portfolio management
-
Licensing and coexistence agreements
-
Oppositions, cancellations, and enforcement
-
Trademark litigation and dispute resolution
Copyrights
-
Registration of creative works, content, software, and media
-
Licensing agreements and royalty arrangements
-
Infringement monitoring and take‑downs
-
DMCA policy drafting and compliance
-
Copyright litigation and dispute resolution
Patents
-
Patentability searches and infringement opinions
-
S. and foreign (PCT) patent prosecution
-
Office actions, appeals, reissues, and reexaminations
-
Portfolio management and technology transfer
-
Patent litigation and disputes
Trade Secrets
-
Trade secret audits and policy development
-
Employee confidentiality and invention assignment agreements
-
Client and vendor nondisclosure agreements (NDAs)
-
Data protection and cybersecurity protocols
-
Breach response plans
-
Trade secret litigation and injunctions
Transactions & Contracts
-
Name, Image, Likeness (NIL) compliance
-
IP‑related commercial contracts and licensing
-
Technology transactions, transfer and development agreements
-
IP ownership, transfer, and acquisition agreements
-
R&D collaborations and joint ventures
-
Entertainment, media, and publishing agreements
-
Mergers and acquisitions (IP due diligence and deal support)
Experience
Professionals
- office 614.227.2346
- office 502.562.7355
- office 614.227.4818
- office 513.870.6682
- office 615.251.6683
- office 502.562.7248
- office 502.562.7342
- office 502.562.7101
- office 513.629.2765
- office 513.629.2804
- office 513.629.2806
- office 502.562.7375
- office 901.537.1087
- office 513.629.2831
- office 615.251.6708
- office 502.562.7523
- office 513.629.2733
- office 901.537.1057
- office 513.629.2799
- office 859.288.7667
- office 614.227.2333
- office 614.227.4892
- office 901.537.1069
- office 502.562.7130
- office 502.562.7378
- office 502.562.7307
Insights
News
Publications
Blog Posts
- Trademark Tee-Off: Tiger's New Brand in the Bunker?Blog Post
- Making Sense of Machine LearningBlog Post
- Supreme Court to Shape Contours of Online Platform Liability for Third-Party ContentBlog Post
- Think Like a Champion to Get Your Ideas NoticedBlog Post
- Domo Arigato, Mr. Roboto Revisited - Federal Circuit Weighs In: Can Artificial Intelligence be an Inventor on a Patent?Blog Post
- Two-Sentence Ruling By SCOTUS Unlikely To Be Last Word In Social Media Censoring ControversyBlog Post
- Influencer and Dress Designer Hayley Paige Gets Rights to TikTok Account, But Still Prohibited From Using Her Own NameBlog Post
- Assignor Estoppel Under the Supreme Court’s Minerva Surgical v. Hologic OpinionBlog Post
- What’s Fair is Fair: Recent Supreme Court Case Defines Ability of Innovator to Challenge Patent Rights It SoldBlog Post
- Circuit Split Created by Third Circuit’s Interpretation of Section 230’s Intellectual Property Exception in Hepp v. FacebookBlog Post
- Domo Arigato, Mr. Roboto: Can Artificial Intelligence be Listed as an Inventor on a Patent?Blog Post
- Alleged Assignment Under Employment Agreement Ruled Insufficient to Convey Patent OwnershipBlog Post
- Executive Action on Non-CompetesBlog Post
- Supreme Court to Rule on Copyright Referral Issue in Suit against H&MBlog Post
- Assembling the Pieces: Practical Lessons from Recent IP PostsBlog Post
- PROBING QUESTIONS BY COURTS FORETOLD RULING OF PATENT INVALIDITYBlog Post
- DoorDash Patent Shows Some Patents Are Granted for Incremental AdvancesBlog Post
- Patent Invalidated Due To “Impossibility” In The ClaimsBlog Post
- Sixth Circuit Finds Courier-Journal’s Use of “Derby Pie” Not a Trademark UseBlog Post
- If Congress Amends Law Affecting Social Media Platforms, Will It Use A Scalpel, Or a Hammer And Chisel?Blog Post
- NLRB Opinion Reaffirms Focus on Message Rather Than IntentBlog Post
- DO YOU FEEL LUCKY?Blog Post
- Trademark Plaintiff Not Required to Show Willful Infringement Before Award of Infringer’s Profits – Supreme Court Settles Split Among the Circuits in Romag DecisionBlog Post
- PRACTICAL DATA SECURITY TIPS FOR ALL GENERATIONS TO AVOID COVID-19 SCAMMERSBlog Post
- Intellectual Property & COVID-19Blog Post
Contact
- office 502.562.7355



























