Overview
From pre-litigation negotiations to state and federal litigation, trademark opposition and cancellation proceedings, we are committed to resolving your high-stakes IP disputes.
Our experienced attorneys represent both plaintiffs and defendants in resolving complex intellectual property disputes through litigation, mediation, arbitration, and administrative channels. With technical and legal experience, we handle IP cases efficiently to reach client goals, leveraging targeted discovery, well-crafted arguments, and strategic use of expert witnesses. In high-value disputes, we pursue injunctions, damages, and other remedies for infringement while defending against excessive claims. Clients trust our proven track record of favorably resolving copyright, patent, trademark, and trade secret conflicts across industries.
Services Include:
-
Patent, Trademark, and Copyright Litigation: We have extensive experience in litigating cases involving intellectual property rights throughout the country. Whether you are seeking to enforce your patent, trademark, or copyright rights, or are defending yourself against such assertion, we have the right team to confidently and strategically represent you.
-
Trademark Representation at USPTO: If your trademark registration is under threat, our dedicated team has experience representing clients before the USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. Whether defending your registered trademark against opposition proceedings initiated by another party or challenging someone else's trademark registration through a cancellation proceeding, our attorneys are adept at navigating the intricacies of trademark disputes.
-
Domain Name Dispute Resolution: Our team is well-versed in guiding clients through the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) arbitration process. This streamlined procedure, applicable to domain names registered with ICANN-accredited registrars, ensures efficient and effective resolution. We also navigate international arbitration proceedings under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy.
-
Coexistence and Settlement Agreements: In certain instances, disputes can find resolution through coexistence or settlement agreements. Our team offers guidance in negotiating agreements while safeguarding our client’s intellectual property rights. Whether it's through strategic negotiations or exploring alternative dispute resolution methods, we are committed to finding solutions that serve your best interests.
Professionals
- office 513.870.6682
- office 615.251.6683
- office 502.562.7248
- office 502.562.7342
- office 502.562.7101
- office 216.523.5468
- office 502.562.7355
- office 502.562.7375
- office 614.227.2346
- office 901.537.1087
- office 513.629.2831
- office 615.251.6708
- office 502.562.7523
- office 513.629.2733
- office 901.537.1057
- office 513.629.2799
- office 901.537.1069
- office 502.562.7130
- office 901.537.1020
- office 502.562.7378
- office 502.562.7307
Insights
News
Blog Posts
- Making Sense of Machine LearningBlog Post
- Supreme Court to Shape Contours of Online Platform Liability for Third-Party ContentBlog Post
- Think Like a Champion to Get Your Ideas NoticedBlog Post
- Domo Arigato, Mr. Roboto Revisited - Federal Circuit Weighs In: Can Artificial Intelligence be an Inventor on a Patent?Blog Post
- Two-Sentence Ruling By SCOTUS Unlikely To Be Last Word In Social Media Censoring ControversyBlog Post
- Influencer and Dress Designer Hayley Paige Gets Rights to TikTok Account, But Still Prohibited From Using Her Own NameBlog Post
- Assignor Estoppel Under the Supreme Court’s Minerva Surgical v. Hologic OpinionBlog Post
- What’s Fair is Fair: Recent Supreme Court Case Defines Ability of Innovator to Challenge Patent Rights It SoldBlog Post
- Circuit Split Created by Third Circuit’s Interpretation of Section 230’s Intellectual Property Exception in Hepp v. FacebookBlog Post
- Domo Arigato, Mr. Roboto: Can Artificial Intelligence be Listed as an Inventor on a Patent?Blog Post
- Alleged Assignment Under Employment Agreement Ruled Insufficient to Convey Patent OwnershipBlog Post
- Executive Action on Non-CompetesBlog Post
- Supreme Court to Rule on Copyright Referral Issue in Suit against H&MBlog Post
- Assembling the Pieces: Practical Lessons from Recent IP PostsBlog Post
- PROBING QUESTIONS BY COURTS FORETOLD RULING OF PATENT INVALIDITYBlog Post
- DoorDash Patent Shows Some Patents Are Granted for Incremental AdvancesBlog Post
- Patent Invalidated Due To “Impossibility” In The ClaimsBlog Post
- Sixth Circuit Finds Courier-Journal’s Use of “Derby Pie” Not a Trademark UseBlog Post
- If Congress Amends Law Affecting Social Media Platforms, Will It Use A Scalpel, Or a Hammer And Chisel?Blog Post
- NLRB Opinion Reaffirms Focus on Message Rather Than IntentBlog Post
- DO YOU FEEL LUCKY?Blog Post
- Trademark Plaintiff Not Required to Show Willful Infringement Before Award of Infringer’s Profits – Supreme Court Settles Split Among the Circuits in Romag DecisionBlog Post
- PRACTICAL DATA SECURITY TIPS FOR ALL GENERATIONS TO AVOID COVID-19 SCAMMERSBlog Post
- Intellectual Property & COVID-19Blog Post
Contacts
- office 614.227.2346
- office 901.537.1087
- office 513.629.2799




















