Overview
Overview
Our attorneys assist clients with all aspects of trademark, trade dress, copyright, trade secret, and unfair competition law to protect, enforce, and grow their valuable IP assets. We understand the unique needs of higher education institutions with respect to the creation, development, licensing, and transfer of intellectual property on campus, and we help schools of all sizes maximize and protect their brand.
Services
Trademarks: Our team helps higher education clients manage their mark portfolio, including registering and protecting their trademarks, developing and vetting a licensing strategy, training relevant stakeholders, and resolving disputes through state, federal, and USPTO tribunals.
Copyrights: Copyright and the issues that surround it arise all over campus. Our team is adept at working through the nuances surrounding the ownership of the creative expression of ideas. From faculty to student development, we provide strategic guidance to help minimize risk while fostering innovation.
NIL: The impact of Name, Image, and Likeness on campus is growing steadily. We work with institutions to find a holistic approach to protect their brand while maximizing the student-athlete experience on campus. Our team was among the first to publish a series on how institutions could navigate the world of NIL when it burst onto the scene in July 2021.
Trade Secrets: We help higher education institutions safeguard valuable trade secrets and ensure employees know their responsibilities in protecting their proprietary information.
Dispute Resolution: While we strive to keep our clients out of disputes, we have the expertise to prosecute and defend IP matters when they arise. Our team is complemented by a deep litigation bench ready to litigate in state or federal court, or before the USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.
Professionals
- office 614.227.2346
- office 502.562.7355
- office 502.562.7248
- office 502.562.7101
- office 614.227.2360
- office 502.562.7375
- office 901.537.1087
- office 513.629.2831
- office 502.562.7523
- office 513.629.2733
- office 901.537.1057
- office 614.227.4892
- office 502.562.7130
- office 502.562.7378
- office 502.562.7307
Insights
News
Events
Publications
Blog Posts
- Making Sense of Machine LearningBlog Post
- Supreme Court to Shape Contours of Online Platform Liability for Third-Party ContentBlog Post
- Think Like a Champion to Get Your Ideas NoticedBlog Post
- Domo Arigato, Mr. Roboto Revisited - Federal Circuit Weighs In: Can Artificial Intelligence be an Inventor on a Patent?Blog Post
- Two-Sentence Ruling By SCOTUS Unlikely To Be Last Word In Social Media Censoring ControversyBlog Post
- Influencer and Dress Designer Hayley Paige Gets Rights to TikTok Account, But Still Prohibited From Using Her Own NameBlog Post
- Assignor Estoppel Under the Supreme Court’s Minerva Surgical v. Hologic OpinionBlog Post
- What’s Fair is Fair: Recent Supreme Court Case Defines Ability of Innovator to Challenge Patent Rights It SoldBlog Post
- Circuit Split Created by Third Circuit’s Interpretation of Section 230’s Intellectual Property Exception in Hepp v. FacebookBlog Post
- Domo Arigato, Mr. Roboto: Can Artificial Intelligence be Listed as an Inventor on a Patent?Blog Post
- Alleged Assignment Under Employment Agreement Ruled Insufficient to Convey Patent OwnershipBlog Post
- Executive Action on Non-CompetesBlog Post
- Supreme Court to Rule on Copyright Referral Issue in Suit against H&MBlog Post
- Assembling the Pieces: Practical Lessons from Recent IP PostsBlog Post
- PROBING QUESTIONS BY COURTS FORETOLD RULING OF PATENT INVALIDITYBlog Post
- DoorDash Patent Shows Some Patents Are Granted for Incremental AdvancesBlog Post
- Patent Invalidated Due To “Impossibility” In The ClaimsBlog Post
- Sixth Circuit Finds Courier-Journal’s Use of “Derby Pie” Not a Trademark UseBlog Post
- If Congress Amends Law Affecting Social Media Platforms, Will It Use A Scalpel, Or a Hammer And Chisel?Blog Post
- NLRB Opinion Reaffirms Focus on Message Rather Than IntentBlog Post
- DO YOU FEEL LUCKY?Blog Post
- Trademark Plaintiff Not Required to Show Willful Infringement Before Award of Infringer’s Profits – Supreme Court Settles Split Among the Circuits in Romag DecisionBlog Post
- PRACTICAL DATA SECURITY TIPS FOR ALL GENERATIONS TO AVOID COVID-19 SCAMMERSBlog Post
- Intellectual Property & COVID-19Blog Post
Contacts
- office 614.227.2346
- office 502.562.7355














